The Rages of a Part-Time Feminist, Full-Time Barrier Destroyer
I consumed a
healthy dose of derogatory quotes about women this week while studying society 1950s
and writing a paper about love and marriage in the 17th century.
It started
with things like this from Luther:
“The entire female body was created for the purpose of
nurturing children” and “Women
are not created for any other purpose than to serve and to be his [man’s]
assistant in producing children.”
And Then Life Magazine from the 1950s came along
and said,
AND I can read. and I'm a Mormon:) |
“Of all the accomplishments of the American woman, the one
she brings off with the most spectacular success is having babies.”
Followed by “Books
and babies don’t mix.”
I'm a woman. I can cook. |
Nothing sets me off like me off like preconceived, accepted notions that are so
obviously offensive yet apparently not for their time.
Although I
often talk about the many men in my head (like Hobbes, Napoleon, Machiavelli,
Marx, Tolstoy, etc), there are plenty of women-folk up there too who just go berserk
when anything slightly anti-feminist comes up.
They sure know
how to cause a riot up there with the screaming and hunger striking and all,
even when I don’t consider myself a full-time feminist.
I think I’m
just obsessed with the concept of breaking down social barriers and doing
things outside the norm (thank you lessons and stories from history).
Which is why
I continue to think that pretending to be a bush is a good idea to avoid small
talk. (Okay, I admit I’ve had better ideas of doing things outside the norm).
And so even
though I am not opposed to wearing lip stick (because actually I’m kind of obsessed
with lip-wear) and being womanly (or however you describe that….it’s different
from being lady-like), if someone tells me I need to act like a submissive,
picture-perfect lady, we (my headstrong women upstairs and I) go into rebellion
mode.
Which maybe
is an authority issue.
#midblogexistentialcrisis
Anyways. I’m
not against mothers. Or being a mother. Actually, I’m super excited about that
upcoming part of time (upcoming meaning in the next two decades?) and I just
adore my mom for being brilliant and loving and I’m thankful she stayed home
with us when we were growing up. But she
did it with mucho brain-power.
However I
don’t think being the perfect wife or giving birth to three children was her sole purpose (though I imagine it definitely helped her achieve many goals
and desires she had).
And she’s
definitely had more successes in life than going through repeated labor. Though
I can’t actually attest to that for sure. I just feel like the way Life Magazine phrased it implied
that birthing babies was an art that should be measured and critiqued to judge
the value of a woman. Which is false. Duh.
And back to
attacking aforementioned quotes, my mom has definitely mixed books and babies
without disastrous results. Unless you consider turning all your kids into
bookworms an adverse effect, that is.
So these are
the thoughts I’ve tried to control as I’ve spent the week writing papers about
love and marriage during the Reformation, about the 18th century
empresses of Russia (who are admirably stubborn and strong-willed), and about the
wussy women who were idolized in the 1950s.
Maybe that’s
why I started bench pressing again.
And stopped
cleaning even though I actually love homemaking.
#endofblogexistentialcrisis
Still
figuring out how to deal with authority issues and rebel in a healthy way. This
week it was definitely via raging feminist thoughts.
Though we
women may be kick-trash mothers, sisters, or daughters, our talents and skills
go way beyond that too. And we will repeatedly tell you so and then prove it.
Comments
Post a Comment